"Terrorist Nuke"
This card is one of the most shocking of all, especially in light of the fact that this game first hit the specialty stores in 1995! How in the world did Steve Jackson know that the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were going to be attacked? In fact, this card accurately depicted the World Trade Center attack in great detail. This card accurately depicts several facts of 9/11 -- on cards created all the way back in 1995! The picture accurately depicts:
* That one tower was going to be struck first; this picture accurately depicts the moments between the first tower strike and the second.
* The card accurately depicts that the place of impact is some distance from the top of the twin towers. The plane hit in this approximate area of the first tower. How in the world could Steve Jackson know this fact?
* The card accurately depicts the Illuminati leadership by showing on the building to the extreme left of the card the Illuminist pyramid with an all-seeing eye in the middle.
* The caption at the top properly identifies the perpetrators of the attack as "terrorists"
However, what does the caption to this card mean? It says, "Terrorist Nuke". Now, what could this possibly mean? The Twin Towers were not destroyed by a terrorist nuclear device, or were they? In our article on the Bali Blast, we noted the scientific data that suggested the hotel was taken down by a micro-nuclear device of about 0.10 kilotons [Read NEWS1715]. One can only ask: was a micro-nuclear device used at the base of the Twin Towers as well? That kind of small, but nuclear, explosion would account for the sudden manner the reinforced concrete and steel shell simply crumbled into dust as it fell. That kind of nuclear explosion would also explain the tremendous heat that stayed at "Ground Zero" for several months after 9/11. As we head into the planned "terrorist attacks" and attendant panics, we have to remain cognizant that a micro-nuke device might be the real culprit in some of these attacks.
Title: WAS A "MICRO-NUKE" WARHEAD USED IN BALI BLAST? UPDATED October 16, 2002
NEWS BRIEF: "At Least 188 Killed in Bali Nightclub Bombing; 2 Americans Among Dead", Fox News, October 13, 2002.
"BALI, Indonesia — Two Americans were among the 188 clubgoers -- many of them foreign tourists -- killed in Bali Saturday night in a double terrorist bombing, the State Department has confirmed to Fox News. The island paradise was the scene of chaotic exodus after the bombing, possibly linked to Al Qaeda, which wounded more than 300. Three Americans were among the injured. Many of those killed by the two bombs that tore through a nightclub district on the island were Australians as well as other foreigners from Canada, Britain, Germany, and Sweden."
After enduring the macabre news about a great number of Palestinian suicide bombings against a large variety of buildings over the past 20 years, I was taken aback by the huge number of casualties of this blast in Bali; I do not ever remember a casualty toll as large as 188, and possibly climbing. I also do not remember that some of the survivors had their skin falling off, for that is a symptom of a nuclear blast. Let us continue with the news story.
"The destruction started when a small homemade bomb exploded outside Paddy's Discotheque in the maze of clubs and bars on Kuta Beach, a popular haunt with young travelers. Shortly afterward, a huge blast from a bomb in a Toyota Kijang, a jeep-like vehicle, 30 yards down the street devastated the crowded Sari Club, a surfers' hangout. A third, smaller bomb exploded outside the U.S. Consular office. No one was injured in that blast. The second blast ripped into the open-air bar, triggering a massive burst of flames that officials said was caused by the explosion of gas cylinders used for cooking. The explosion collapsed the roof of the flimsy structure, trapping revelers in flaming wreckage. The explosions and fire damaged about 20 buildings and devastated much of the block."
As this paragraph correctly states, the blast was "huge", and it triggered "a massive burst of flames". Officials attempted to pass this fireball off to gas cylinders used for cooking, which may or may not be true. However, we do know that the blast triggered an exceedingly powerful torrent of air that collapsed the roof, trapped many in the now burning wood, and damaged as many as 47 buildings in the vicinity. That is quite a lot of destruction to occur from a conventional blast set off from a jeep-type vehicle sitting on the street.
" 'All the buildings in the vicinity just collapsed, cars overturned and debris from the buildings fell on them, he [a bystander] said, without giving his hometown. 'I have never seen anything so horrible. There were so many people, 18 to 20 year olds, people in pieces all over the street.'New Zealander Lonny McDowell, 25, was at Paddy's when the blast blew chairs and concrete through the bar. He said he saw a man with no legs and another with a cable stuck through his stomach."
Once again, the destruction, the death toll, and the devastation seems too large to be caused by conventional explosives. Let us now review another article for yet more information.
NEWS BRIEF: "Indonesian Nightclub Bombing, Called an 'Act of Terror", by Fox News, October 12, 2002.
"The explosion went off about 11 p.m. ... Witnesses on the popular tourist island said that the flames spread to another club and burned several other buildings on the same block and a dozen cars. The place was packed, and it went up within a millisecond ..."
This word, "millisecond" stuck in my throat, for that is a word normally reserved for nuclear explosions. Once a warhead goes critical, the chain reaction occurs in milliseconds, as does the resulting destruction. This blast seemed unusually huge and destructive.
Let us now go back to this article for more information.
"Australia tourist Rachel Hughes, 18, said she and a friend had just arrived in Kuta when the blast occurred. Standing in the foyer of the Bounty Hotel, 'people were just walking in, blood dripping off them, burns to their face, skin coming off them,' she told Australia's Seven Network."
Once again, severe burns and skin coming off the bones is a result of exposure to a nuclear blast; however, all these details do not conclusively point to a nuclear blast instead of a conventional one, so let us continue our investigation. Before we move on, two factors seem important:
1. The blast occurred at 11 p.m. local time. The number '11' has been associated with the Illuminati and their plans to produce their Christ [Antichrist];
2. Muslim terrorist groups love to take credit for a blast they have successfully carried it out; however, no group stepped forward to take public responsibility. Surely, they would love to take credit for such a successful terrorist attack as this one! Notice that the National Police Chief of Indonesia was the one who claimed the blast was a terrorist blast. Immediately after his statement President Bush and other Western leaders issued calls for more strident measures to be taken against "global terrorism".
DETAILS THAT POINT DIRECTLY TO A NUCLEAR DEVICE
NEWS BRIEF: "Micro Nuke Used in Bali 'Terrorist' Lookalike Attack", by Joe Viallis, Friends of Liberty, October 14, 2002.
" In the words of a tourist who earlier survived attacks on London during the nineties, 'I felt my hotel shake violently and ran to look out of the window. In the distance I could see a large white mushroom cloud, and knew I wasn’t looking at an ordinary attack'.”
Certainly, if a tourist saw a "large white mushroom cloud" in the distance over the blast, that is a solid indication that a nuclear device had been used. Perhaps one reason for detonating this bomb so late at night would be to minimize the numbers of people that would actually be outside to witness the white mushroom cloud.
Let us go back to our story:
 |  |  |
Notice the workers examining the 5-foot-deep crater caused by this blast. Listen to Viallis explain the significance:
"Photographic evidence proving the use of an unconventional weapon was edited out almost immediately by the major media, though not from the amateur video camera which provided the picture at top center above. It alone shows the deep crater being probed by Indonesian police and military with a [very long] pole. The very presence of the crater itself proves the weapon was detonated sub-surface, while the crater’s depth in combination with its diameter, prove the depth at which the weapon was initially placed."
Thus, if this bomb was placed underground, then the story of the blast occurring from a bomb placed in a "jeep-like" vehicle are as phony as the story that the devastating blast damage at the Oklahoma City Murrah Building was caused by a fertilizer bomb placed inside a Ryder Rental truck parked outside! The officials in charge of a disaster scene do love to provide phony facts that get people looking in the wrong direction for the wrong culprits in order to arrive at the wrong conclusion! Thus, in the Beltway Sniper shootings, "witnesses" are reported to have seen people leaving the general scene of a shooting in a white van, or was it a white box type delivery truck? The reality is that a skilled sniper probably would be using a breakaway rifle that he can break down on the spot and carry out of the area inside a lightweight jacket so that he would never have to get into a vehicle, much less a white truck.
For the same reason, we are told the bomb was detonated above ground from a jeep-type vehicle; however, that would not explain a five foot crater. Only a bomb set inside the ground would have created a crater this large. Another story confirms the 5-foot-deep crater:
NEWS BRIEF: "Bush calls for action after Bali blast", Business Day, http://www.bday.co.za/bday/content/direct/1,3523,1199284-6078-0,00.html, 15 October 2002.
"At the scene of the Kuta blast, about 300 metres of street looked absolutely devastated, buildings on both side of the road totally destroyed ...Outside what was once the vibrant Sari Club, there was nothing standing with a crater 1.5 metres [5 feet] deep where the bomb went off and now a puddle of water."
Now, if you have a 5 feet wide crater, caused by a nuclear explosion, the width of the crater should be 12.8 feet [4 meters] wide. Listen to this news story confirm the 4 meters width of the crater.
NEWS BRIEF: "Death Toll Soars In Bali Blast", BruneiDirect.Com,http://www.brudirect.com/DailyInfo/News/Archive/Oct02/131002/nite08.htm
"The Sari Club in the resort of Kuta - a nightspot popular with Western tourists - was reduced to a heap of smouldering ruins by the blast, which also wrecked nearby discos, restaurants and a hotel. It gouged out a four-metre-wide crater."
Remember these facts, for they will play a significant role at the end of this article.
If a nuclear device producing a 5-foot deep crater that is 13 feet wide [4 meters], people at least several kilometers away could hear and feel the explosion. Listen to this story confirm that detail.
NEWS BRIEF: "Rugby players killed in Bali blast", Ireland On-Line
"The shockwaves caused by the two explosions could be felt two kilometres away, he said. It caused the walls of his hotel around the corner to shake and other buildings in the area had their windows blown out. 'We got back to the room and it felt like someone was banging on the shutters,' he said, adding that there was now a crater around the area where the car bomb had exploded."
Let us return to the Friends of Liberty story for more details:
"At the very minimum the damage caused in the Kuta Beach area would require an 8,000 pound HE blast-bomb of the sort used on London during the Second World War. Problem! How on earth do you squeeze 8,000 pounds of very bulky low-specific-gravity HE into a twelve-inch diameter sewerage pipe, located nearly five feet underground? Obviously what you need is a specialized weapon significantly less than twelve inches in diameter, but with a blast capability significantly in excess of 8,000 pounds of conventional explosive. Believe me people, there is only one weapon for the job, which explains why you will probably never see the damning crater picture at the top of this page anywhere else. The blast from this weapon was so severe that its detonation terminally damaged 47 buildings in the immediate area, and trashed more than one hundred vehicles ..."
These facts seem to indicate that a small nuclear device was used. How else do you get a crater five-foot-deep and 13 feet wide, 47 buildings destroyed, over a hundred cars destroyed, skin falling off the bones, and such a high death toll? How small of a device would make this type of explosion, and who has the capability to get their hands on such a weapon? From the Brookings Institute, we get some very interesting pictures that give us a lot of detail. This information was provided courtesy of the National Resources Defense Council.
Notice that this device weighs only 163 pounds as of 1988, fully 14 years ago. It was capable of producing a blast of 0.01, or 0.02-1 kiloton and was operationally deployed between 1964 and 1988. These inclusive dates sound as if this particular device was discontinued in 1988, undoubtedly because it was superseded by other, more compact, and possibly more devastating weapons. These weapons were planned to be used primarily as land mines to slow down the approach of enemy troops; on other words, they were planned to be buried before detonation!
As we quoted toward the beginning of this article, no Arab terrorist group -- including Al Qaeda -- is known to have possession of such weaponry. The list of countries who have this weaponry are: the United States, Russia, Britain, France, Israel, and maybe China! However, the United States pioneered the development of this type of weaponry, starting back late in the decade of the 1950's.
Now, let us return to the discussion as to the specifications of the type of weapon that might cause this type and this severity of blast:
"Obviously what you need is a specialized weapon significantly less than twelve inches in diameter, but with a blast capability significantly in excess of 8,000 pounds of conventional explosive. Believe me people, there is only one weapon for the job, which explains why you will probably never see the damning crater picture at the top of this page anywhere else. The actual photograph of SADM shown below is of an early version nominally rated at 10 tons TNT equivalent. More recent variants are as small as a coffee mug, though still very heavy, and have explosive yields ranging from 2 to 100 tons TNT equivalent."
REPORT: TERRORISTS WOULD HAVE LITTLE DIFFICULTY USING NUCLEAR DEVICE
"High-Impact Terrorism: Proceedings of a Russian-American Workshop (2002)", The National Academies Press.
"In conclusion, potential nuclear terrorists would encounter no serious technical problems in constructing a simple, low-yield (in the order of a few tons of TNT equivalent) and low weight (in the order of a few hundred kilograms) gun-type explosive nuclear device using weapons grade or reactor-grade plutonium. A device of this kind would have destructive and kill ranges of about 100 meters. Moreover, it would produce radioactive fallout with a few tens of curies as well as a cloud containing a few kilograms of plutonium oxide aerosol." [http://books.nap.edu/books/0309082706/html/159.html#pagetop]
Such a cloud of radioactive fallout would also dissipate rather rapidly; if officials were not on the scene quickly with radioactive monitors, the telltale signature of such a low-yield nuclear warhead would have disappeared.
What potential threat to our democratic way of life is posed by a nuclear terrorist threat? Listen carefully, for the news is not good.
"The public's fear of nuclear weapons -- or for that matter, of all radioactivity -- is intense. To some extent, this fear arises from a sense of unlimited vulnerability. That is, radioactivity is seen unbounded in three dimensions: distance -- it is viewed as having unlimited reach; quantity -- it is viewed as having deadly consequences in the smallest of doses ... and time-- if it does not kill you immediately, it will cause cancer decades hence."
"Fred Ikle recently stated that 'the morning after ... a nuclear weapon has been used, the rules of warfare throughout the world will be profoundly transformed. Democracy cannot survive if a nuclear detonation can be detonated in Paris or Manhattan." [http://books.nap.edu/books/0309082706/html/149.html]
Let us repeat that most significant of statements: "Democracy cannot survive if a nuclear detonation can be detonated in ... Manhattan."
Notice this statement did not say that "Democracy cannot survive if a nuclear detonation annihilates Manhattan." No, the entire city does not have to be destroyed to sow the kind of panic for which the Illuminati is seeking. Once officials confirm that a nuclear detonation has occurred, the public misconception of the effects of a nuclear device, coupled with the scientific facts, will combine to produce the kind of panic that would allow the Illuminati to seize control.
Now you know this Bali-Blast was a practicle practice for a bigger event which was 9/11.
Now you will read the evidence of 9/11 -blast!
TOP TEN REASONS THE WTC COLLAPSE WAS A NUCLEAR EVENT
1. Thyroid cancer occurs at above-average frequency in 9/11 first responders more than any other type of cancer (see full post for citations). This is a signature of nuclear bombs; they emit iodine-131, which collects in the thyroid, often causing cancer. (This is why some people keep potassium iodide tablets on hand—to protect their thyroid glands in case of a nuclear attack.)
2. World Trade Center dust samples examined by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) found Uranium, Strontium, Barium, Thorium, and other products of nuclear fission, in high concentrations and correlations that only an atomic blast could explain. Although the Survey avoided calling attention to the significance, William Tahil vetted it in his pioneering 2006 book Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the World Trade Centre. (The phrase “ground zero,” incidentally, had only been applied to nuclear detonation sites prior to 9/11.)
3. There was molten steel underneath the rubble of the World Trade Center, whose fires kept burning for over three months. Extraordinary heat is yet another signature of a nuclear bomb.
(Note: I’m aware that molten steel was seen at a corner of the South Tower before its collapse; I don’t doubt that pre-planted explosives were in the Towers, probably including the incendiary thermite, but I don’t believe these explosives were what destroyed the WTC. To clarify, each Tower had six basement levels, and the thesis of my full post—which I had excellent assistance with—is that each Tower was destroyed by a suitcase nuke positioned at the lowest point in either building: the services pits beneath elevator 50. This was the only elevator that ran the full length of either Tower, and the only elevator whose service pits were carved into the bedrock beneath the World Trade Center. This location would make the ideal “launching pad” for a nuke, as the bedrock would contain the sideways and downward force of a nuclear explosion, which would follow the path of least resistance up through the shaft. See the full post for diagrams.)
4. The Towers did not simply “fall,” they exploded, throwing chunks of steel weighing multiple tons hundreds of feet. Check, for example, this piece that embedded itself in the American Express Building across the street:
No exotic weapons are needed to explain this. A nuclear bomb is the most powerful explosive known.
5. The Towers’ inner contents were vaporized: no furniture, filing cabinets (except one), computers, or toilets survived. All turned into dust. Even the buildings’ concrete became dust, instead of falling as chunks of debris. The vaporization, of course, included the people inside (whole bodies that were found belonged to people who jumped before the Towers disintegrated). Not only is a nuclear bomb the most powerful explosive known, its blast—unlike conventional explosives—endures for several seconds, enabling it to inflict considerably more damage.
6. At the times of the two Tower “collapses,” seismographs at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, New York, recorded enormous off-the-chart spikes consistent with huge explosions.
This shot of the South Tower exploding caught a huge singular upward burst of energy.
Likewise, when the North Tower explodes, a great, singular flash of flame is visible inside the building:
7. A nuclear blast explains the damage to the rest of the World Trade Center. Buildings 5 and 7 suffered enormous fires, and building 6 was cratered out. These phenomena could not have begun before the Towers’ destruction; otherwise, videos of the burning Towers would have shown additional smoke plumes, and cameras would have panned to the blazes.
Nuclear blasts originating at the lowest levels of the Twin Towers may provide the answer. Underground the World Trade Center was interconnected by pipes, not only for sewage, but a 3-foot-wide storm water drainage system.
Any building’s place at greatest risk for flooding is its lowest point. For the Twin Towers, this would have been Elevator 50’s service pits. From here flood water would be pumped through pipes to the 36-inch storm drain. Thus atomic blasts here would not only follow the path of least resistance through Elevator 50’s shaft, but through the 36-inch storm water drain, traveling through the underground pipes and shooting up through buildings 5, 6 and 7, igniting them. Falling debris could not have caused the raging internal fires seen in the smaller buildings; edifices outside the World Trade Center (American Express Building, Winter Garden Atrium) were heavily impacted by debris, but they did not catch fire. THEY WERE NOT CONNECTED TO THE WTC’S UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
Please see my full post for elaboration and documentation of the above point.
8. On 9/11, New Yorkers fled two terrifying dust clouds that engulfed the area surrounding the WTC. Anyone who watches videos of nuclear bombs detonating will see that they create sprawling ground-level clouds. Although building demolitions also routinely make dust clouds, the 9/11 ones seemed to have had a life of their own.
(A noteworthy observation in this film is that as people flee the cloud behind them, smoke is flowing up from the sewer drains in front of them. Since the World Trade Center’s underground pipes ultimately emptied into New York City’s sewer, this is further evidence of the secondary effects of an underground nuke. Continuous flow of nuclear smoke from the sewers might account for the “toasted cars” later noticed along the side streets.)
9. CIA asset Susan Lindauer (second cousin to Andrew Card, George W. Bush’s Chief of Staff) has stated that U.S. intelligence received advance warnings of the 9/11 attacks (her whistle-blowing eventually led to her being sent to a federal prison). According to Lindauer, the advance warning the CIA received included the destruction of the World Trade Center by a “mini-nuke.”3
10. In his 1995 book Fighting Terrorism, Israeli Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu predicted:
Such groups nullify the need to have air power or intercontinental missiles as delivery systems for an Islamic nuclear payload. They will be the delivery system. In the worst of such scenarios, the consequences could be not a car bomb but a nuclear bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center.4 [emphasis his]
Two days after 9/11, NBC’s Tom Brokaw interviewed Netanyahu, who said: to carry in a backpack.
Even though Netanyahu revised “nuclear” to “conventional,” one must ask how he knew the bomb’s specific yield. In fact, how did Bibi know it was a bomb at all? Supposedly plane crashes had brought the Towers down.
A common objection to the nuclear hypothesis: “Where are the post-9/11 Geiger counter readings showing lots of radiation in New York City?” The answer: not all nuclear bombs discharge large amounts of radiation. Most use a combination of nuclear fission and fusion; if the fission is high, fallout (radiation) will be high; but if fission is low compared to fusion, fallout will be low. During the Cold War, the United States began developing tactical nuclear weapons, also known as “battlefield nukes.” In today’s advanced technology, these are often called “minimal residual radiation” weapons (MRRs). Obviously, in a battlefield situation, a low-radiation weapon is desired; otherwise it could harm one’s own army.
What types of nuclear warheads does Israel stockpile? Although this is an ironclad state secret, it should be obvious that Israel would emphasize “battlefield” nukes. In war with its neighbors, it wouldn’t want radiation blowback to Tel Aviv. A modern suitcase nuke is small enough7. A nuclear blast explains the damage to the rest of the World Trade Center. Buildings 5 and 7 suffered enormous fires, and building 6 was cratered out. These phenomena could not have begun before the Towers’ destruction; otherwise, videos of the burning Towers would have shown additional smoke plumes, and cameras would have panned to the blazes.
Nuclear blasts originating at the lowest levels of the Twin Towers may provide the answer. Underground the World Trade Center was interconnected by pipes, not only for sewage, but a 3-foot-wide storm water drainage system.
Any building’s place at greatest risk for flooding is its lowest point. For the Twin Towers, this would have been Elevator 50’s service pits. From here flood water would be pumped through pipes to the 36-inch storm drain. Thus atomic blasts here would not only follow the path of least resistance through Elevator 50’s shaft, but through the 36-inch storm water drain, traveling through the underground pipes and shooting up through buildings 5, 6 and 7, igniting them. Falling debris could not have caused the raging internal fires seen in the smaller buildings; edifices outside the World Trade Center (American Express Building, Winter Garden Atrium) were heavily impacted by debris, but they did not catch fire. THEY WERE NOT CONNECTED TO THE WTC’S UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
"Pentagon" -- When I saw this card, immediately after seeing the Twin Tower picture, my blood froze! Unless one had advanced knowledge of the Illuminati Plan, there is no way on earth that they would have been able to create pictures in 1995 that accurately depict the unfolding events of 9/11! The Pentagon is shown on fire; we know that a plane allegedly flew into a section of the Pentagon and nearly burned that section completely. However, the rest of the Pentagon was undamaged to the point where its functions continued unimpeded.
Isn't this the situation depicted here? This card shows a fire burning mightily in the center courtyard of the Pentagon, but the rest of the building looks undamaged enough so that normal activities could continue unimpeded!
Thus, these two cards literally depict both of the strikes of 9/11: against the Twin Towers first and then against the Pentagon.
This kind of accuracy 6 years before the attacks is possible only if one knows the Illuminati Plan very thoroughly.
Hollywood Hints
Much has been discussed about the entertainment industry’s innumerable pre-9/11 predictions.
No film reeks of 9/11 symbolism more than Back to the Future, from Marty’s DeLorean leaving a glowing “911,” to Biff watching a simulated Twin Towers collapse in Back to the Future 2. Director Robert Zemeckis later made a movie about the Twin Towers called The Walk, released in October 2015, the same year and month Marty traveled ahead to in the future. I won’t embed it here, but this 12-minute clipnicely summarizes Back to the Future’s 9/11 predictions.
However, a widely overlooked feature of its foreshadowing is the nuclear element. Here’s Doc explaining to Marty how he powers the flux capacitor:
Doc: Unfortunately no, it requires something with a little more kick, plutonium.
Marty: Uh, plutonium, wait a minute, are you telling me that this sucker’s nuclear?
Then there’s the bumper sticker on Doc’s car:
I acknowledge that this brief Hollywood digression in no way “proves” the Twin Towers were nuked. It’s supplemental, for whatever it may be worth.
댓글
댓글 쓰기