기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Meaning of "Rich man and Lazarus"

Rich Man and Lazarus This parable of Jesus has been quoted for centuries in attempts to prove the existence of a Hell Fire. But, was that really what Jesus was really describing? Notice the context. At Luke 16:14, 15 we read: ‘Now, the Pharisees (who loved silver) were listening to these things and were looking at him with contempt. So he said to them: ‘You are the ones who claim to be righteous before men, but God knows your hearts, and things that are considered important by men are disgusting in God’s eyes.’ Therefore, with the above setting in mind, notice the next two points that Jesus went on to make: ·      First (at Luke 16:16-18) Jesus went on to condemn the haughty Pharisees by saying that ‘anyone who divorces his wife and marries another is guilty of adultery’… so much for righteousness, because leaving their wives (after the women had grown old) and taking younger ones was common practice among such men. ·      Second (at Luke 16:19-31), Jesus went on to tell the story of a ‘rich man’ (like the Pharisees) and a ‘beggar’ (like the common people) who both ‘died.’ So, notice that the real point Jesus was making, was that these men who were considered the ‘spiritually rich’ were about to see a major change in their situation. For after the death of Jesus, their high position as the spiritual leaders of God’s people (the favored position of IsraEl’s ancestor AbraHam, through whom their nation had received their Covenant with God) was going to be taken from them and given to the spiritually poor. Remember that this is what actually happened to them just thirty-seven years later, when JeruSalem (along with its entire form of worship) was totally destroyed and they were led off as captives, while the true arrangement for worshiping God was passed on to the lowly common people or ‘beggars’… the disciples of Jesus. So, this second point that Jesus made (and which the Pharisees doubtlessly understood at least partially) is that; because they had failed to learn from the Law and the Prophets, their high position was going to be taken from them and given to common people. Therefore, as you can see; this isn’t a tale that describes the torture of Hell Fire, it was a verbal picture (or parable) that served as a warning of what was going to happen to those haughty Pharisees (for more information, see the linked document, ‘Is There a Burning Hell?’

댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

"The Origin and History of the Doctrine of Endless Punishment"

<"The Origin and History of the Doctrine of Endless Punishment"> ​ ​ By Thomas B. Thayer ​ ​ ​ *Written in 1855 ​ ​ ㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡ ​ ​ ​ *THE WORD "SHEOL," OR THE OLD TESTAMENT DOCTRINE OF HELL. ​ ​ ㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡ ​ ​ The word Hell, in the Old Te...

Tetragrammaton

Open main menu Search EditWatch this pageRead in another language Tetragrammaton For other uses, see Tetragrammaton (disambiguation). "YHWH" redirects here. For the historic Iron Age deity, see Yahweh. The tetragrammaton in Phoenician (12th century BCE to 150 BCE), Paleo-Hebrew (10th century BCE to 135 CE), and square Hebrew (3rd century BCE to present) scripts The tetragrammaton (/ˌtɛtrəˈɡræmətɒn/; from Greek Τετραγράμματον, meaning "[consisting of] four letters"), יהוה‬ in Hebrew and YHWH in Latin script, is the four-letter biblical name of the God of Israel.[1][2] The books of the Torah and the rest of the Hebrew Bible (with the exception of Esther, and Song of Songs) contain this Hebrew name. Religiously observant Jews and those who follow conservative Jewish traditions do not pronounce יהוה‬, nor do they read aloud transliterated forms such as Yahweh; instead the word is substituted with a different term, whether used to address or to refer to the God of Isra...

Mateo 28:19 es falso?

MATEO 28:19 FALSO...? ""LEA ESTE DOCUMENTO COMPLETO Y SAQUE SUS CONCLUCIONES"" Una simple reflexión a causa de…  QUÉ ES CONNOTADA LA ESTAFA POR LA ADULTERACIÓN DEL VERSO DE MATEO 28:19 Mateo 28:19 Por tanto, id, y haced discípulos a todas las naciones, bautizándolos en nombre del Padre, y del Hijo y del Espíritu Santo. Comentario:  Este es el verso más importante para los “Trinitarios” como para sostener su falsa “doctrina trinitaria” y el falso nombre en el cual deben de ser “Bautizadas” las personas y es muy evidente la importancia el demostrar que se trata de una “descarada estafa” la adulteración del verso por parte de la “Iglesia católica romana”. CODEX SINAITICUS 300 d.c. En este “Codex” debería aparecer la palabra G4151 πνεῦμα – pneúma de G4154; corriente de aire, i.e. respiración (soplo) o brisa; por analogía o figurativamente un espíritu, i.e. (humano) el alma racional, (por implicación) principio vital, mentalmente disposición, etc., o (...